BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Getty Images Sues AI Company Over Hideous Frankenphotos

Following

Getty Images has filed a new lawsuit in the U.S. against the company behind Stable Diffusion, an immensely popular AI image creator. And while the photos included in the lawsuit are all about dissecting a notoriously dry subject like copyright infringement, they’re actually really funny.

Getty alleges in the lawsuit that Stability AI has engaged in “brazen infringement of Getty Images’ intellectual property on a staggering scale,” and claims the AI company is effectively trying to start a competing business.

“Stability AI has copied more than 12 million photographs from Getty Images’ collection, along with the associated captions and metadata, without permission from or compensation to Getty Images,” the lawsuit reads.

The suit, first reported by The Verge on Monday, was filed in Delaware on Friday. And reading through the lawsuit, which is available in its entirety online, you’re treated to some pretty odd examples of Stable Diffusion’s image generation. Some of the images even include a warped version of the Getty Images watermark, as you can see in the creations below.

Many of the examples also include hauntingly weird anatomy that’s become a hallmark of bad AI. For example, we see soccer players with their legs in impossibly backwards positions, and humans melting into each other, to create kind of Lovecraftian monstrosity.

Getty even called out the unappealing nature of some of these AI-generated images as hurting its brand, especially when it comes to trademark law. Getty holds several trademarks for its brand, which are listed in the lawsuit.

“Stability AI’s incorporation of Getty Images’ marks into low quality, unappealing, or offensive images dilutes those marks in further violation of federal and state trademark laws,” the lawsuit reads.

This is all serious business, according to Getty, which says it has safeguards in place for protecting the intellectual property of photographers and other creators, and Stability AI shouldn’t be able to train its robots using Getty’s photos for free.

“In appropriate circumstances, and with safeguards for the rights and interests of its photographers and contributors and the subjects of the images in its collection, Getty Images also licenses the use of its visual assets and associated metadata in connection with the development of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools,” Getty said in the lawsuit.

“Getty Images has licensed millions of suitable digital assets to leading technology innovators for a variety of purposes related to artificial intelligence and machine learning,” the lawsuit continued.

Getty first announced a lawsuit against Stability AI last month in the UK, but apparently that suit hasn’t been served yet. And Getty is far from the only interested party filing suit against AI image generators. Several lawsuits are currently pending against AI generators like Midjourney and DeviantArt as well.

“Getty Images’ name and trademarks are renowned in the U.S. and around the world. Customers perform over 2.7 billion searches annually on the Getty Images’ websites, which exist in 23 languages,” the company explains in the suit.

“Through its full range of content solutions, Getty Images served over 836,000 purchasing customers in the last year alone, with customers from almost every country in the world, ranging from media outlets, advertising agencies, and corporations of all sizes to individual creators. Customers rely on Getty Images for the best content and service, and trust the trademarks and service marks associated with its content,” Getty continued.

I reached out to Getty Images for comment but didn’t immediately hear back. I also reached out to Stability AI. I’ll update this post with any new information or comment either company can provide. Or I’ll update it with more of Stable Diffusion’s weird Frankenphotos. They really are a grotesque imitation of humanity when you look at enough of them.

Follow me on TwitterCheck out my website

Join The Conversation

Comments 

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Read our community guidelines .

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service.  We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

  • False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
  • Content that otherwise violates our site's terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
  • Actions that otherwise violate our site's terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your insights
  • Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
  • ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
  • Protect your community.
  • Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.