18 Comments

  1. Laurel

    On-topic: Local piece on the SA Police initiatives: http://prakky.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/police-have-seized-facebook/

    Slightly off-topic: Is your engagement model (the 7 steps) deliberately focussed on marketing/comms/externally-facing social media? If so, that’s fine (although it should perhaps carry that caveat) – but in a more general sense I think it downplays the value of social media initiatives inside a company (your “shallow” end), for employee engagement, collaboration, knowledge sharing and knowledge discovery.

    1. Actually no, it’s not marketing focussed but an observation of where companies are at, and many of those are marketing focussed. The “eat your own dog food” approach is seen as a risk averse way of extending current collaborative knowledge management systems/intranets with some enterprise social media. The companies themselves see it as a “test” or first step. Not necessarily my opinion πŸ˜‰ I understand their thoughts though – it’s “shallow” because it’s a first step on the path to reorienting the whole company to providing a platform for all members to work together. In other words, a wiki added to the intranet in a bank is first step, peer to peer lending banks on Facebook is endgame. Does that make it clearer? πŸ™‚
      If you like Enterprise based social media, you might like my post on Gamification and Leaderboards in internal enterprise communities πŸ™‚

      1. I see what you’re saying – I guess my point is that “peer to peer lending on Facebook” is not the only endgame, and Facebook and Twitter are not necessarily the best places to do business if your market isn’t end consumers. There is, perhaps, a parallel and complementary “ladder” with a common starting point but a divergent path and endpoint (there may even be several of them, all of which can use social media principles and tools effectively).

        (and I’m subscribed to your feed, so I see it ALL πŸ™‚ )

        1. Totally agree – but again, the ladder is not my view but the view of organisations I work with. I can’t help but report that the majority of major corporations say “we will start with a blog internally and if it goes well, look at broadcasting in social media”.

          … And p2p lending is an example of an endgame – the key point is to have a holistic (all inclusive) society collaborating together. Staff and customers, staff with staff, customers with customers, all of ’em. That’s why it’s deep engagement. Shallow engagement is just one aspect of that be it staff with staff OR staff with customers.
          We agree, I’m just not articulating it very well πŸ˜›

  2. I’ve heard law enforcements have now embrace social media as one of their ways to solve crimes. Great to know some additional information you have here. Most effectively, social media is a good way to disseminate information to the public. I hope some social media related cases would also be solves this problem is mounting now.

  3. I understand their thoughts though – it’s β€œshallow” because it’s a first step on the path to reorienting the whole company to providing a platform for all members to work together.

Comments are closed.