30 Comments

  1. So true – this is a big point I’m pushing within government with citizen-centric service design and consumer consultation. Government simply can’t afford to recruit and retain the expertise needed to apply the best thinking this country has to offer to every problem. In fact, with the competitiveness of the private sector, government cannot hope to attract the best and brightest minds who will find bigger challenges, better pay and higher job satisfaction in the private sector.

    Apart from the fact that government needs to address that particular problem, it’s also important to acknowledge that we need the expertise, opinions, feedback and collective intelligence of people beyond the walls of the office otherwise we *will* deliver sub-standard services and information ineffectively. It’s just maths.

  2. Well done laurel I hope you have offered your services. A problem shared is a burden lessened and there truly is nothing better than a community engaged with the best outcome in mind

  3. SEEMS TO ME THAT HYDROCARBONS FORMED WHEN THE OIL WAS TRYING TO BE CAPTURED BY THE DOME SYSTEM ………RECREATE THIS INSIDE THE LEAKING PIPE AND ALLOW ITSELF TO PLUG ITSELF…. I REALY DON’T KNOW THE WHAT & WHY THEY FORM , BUT THEY DID PLUG UP THE SUCTION TUBE …. SOME BODY MENTIONED TO ME THAT IT INTER ACTED WITH SALT WATER , PUMP THE PIPE WITH SALT WATER ….BUT I HAVEN’T A CHEMICAL CLUE…. COULD IT BE SO SIMPLE ????

    1. THE HYDROCARBONS IS METHANE THE SAME GAS AS IN COAL MINES===THE SAME THING THAT CAUSED THE EXPLOSION THAT STARTED ALL THIS THE WHITE BUBBLY STUFF YOU CAN SEE IN THE VIDEO FEED

  4. Laurel,
    Thanks for the mention in your informative article. I agree with the points you made. BP has been largely clueless with their entire PR campaign, including social media. Their Facebook account remains unattended by any BP employee. Fans of BP’s fan page have increased by over 1,000 in the past two weeks due to the number of enemies signing up so they can post insults on BP’s wall. At BPOilNews.com we have about 400 suggestions now, and our Twitter feed is being followed by the Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security (GOHSEP) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, as well as a number of journalists and environmental groups. GOHSEP is keeping up with suggestions on our blog, and yesterday sent an email thanking us for suggestions. BP apparently finally hired someone with PR skills, and has just opened a telephone hotline for people to call with suggestions. the phone number is 1-281-366-5511. I called the number, expecting a recording, but a live person answered after 2 rings and took my contact information and asked for my suggestion. I told her we had between 300-400 suggestions at http://bpoilnews.com and she asked me to repeat the web address twice and thanked me for the information. I don’t know whether BP will act on this and read the suggestions, or whether it’s merely PR done just a little too little, too late. Whatever it is, I would say it’s about time, coming more than 40 days after the oil rig explosion.
    You have an interesting blog. I like your toolbar at the bottom of the page. How do you do that?

  5. use a sleeve, with a large valve attached on top. secure sleeve to cut oil pipe, and close valve. it makes sense to me. steve

    1. secure sleeve with large valve attached over cut oil pipe, and close valve. steve

      1. Stephen,

        Simple eloquence. I think your idea is great, far more plausible than any of BP’s.Mine’s a little less simple, but here goes from a non-techie mind:

        1.Tack-weld a narrow washer just inside the pipe entrance that is the size of the pipe’s inner circumference.
        2. Insert a closed umbrella-like device past the washer.
        3. Remotely open the “umbrella” til it fills the pipe.
        4. Let it slip back toward the inner side of the washer so that it can’t be forced out by oil pressure.
        5. Squirt sealant through the “stem” of the umbrella and out the top of the stem, permanently stopping the oil flow.

        Keep the ideas coming, America. We can fix this!

  6. While the crap washing up on the gulf coast shores is nasty . it is not useless. It can’t be made into gasoline ,but it will become tar all by itself with time—someone needs to establish a market for it—–oil skimmers are easy to make and simple to use and ,given that there are lots of people around down there with boats and no job for the forseeable future I’m sure that there would be lots of people out cleaning the mess up if they could make a little money doing it.Instead of worrying about the outcome of a law suit with BP which won’t happen for years—-if ever,I’m sure the louisiana shrimpers and just general swamp rats would rather be helping clean this mess up.and a few million dollars would do it—–Good Luck —–Pat

  7. THE PLANKTONIC OIL SKIMMER;
    Take a ring of floatable material(styrafoam, etc) attach a mesh bag so that when the bag is horizontal the bag hangs below it.put a weight in the bottom of the bag the fill the bag with the kind of stuffing from cheap ski jackets have(this absorbs oil even when mixed with water)-=—-make thousands of these —sail into the muck and throw them overboard .If made right they will float just at the surface or just under it (where the oil is) they will all drift ashore eventually,will be easy to identify and easy to dispose of—-they will cost about three cents apiece have no moving parts ,don’t require drug testing and compared to the oil they catch are no mess at all—–SAVE THE GULF!!!!!!!—-Pat

  8. Try a “Drain King”, a simple and easily available plumbing maintanence device the one I have is for pipes between 3″ and 6″ it hooks to a hose and when you turn the water on it swells to stop up the pipe,then allows enough flow to blow the clog. I don’t know if it will function using drill mud but this,or some adaptation could solve the problem—–Pat

  9. Here is an example of what I believe you refer to as crowdsourcing, but we do not use a particular software to facilitate this…we look at the feedback, do our best to evaluate it, then publish the ‘design-in-progress’ as shown on the website. I really liked your article and it wil prompt me to do additional research. Best regards, Greg

  10. We are attempting to ‘crowdsource’ a solution to better contain an oilspill through the website http://www.starfishcapture.org. We’ve been on-line for about of week and have received 10-12 fairly intelligent suggestions that we’ve since incorported into our proposed solution. The solution is presented as a new version of the animation incorporating the selected suggestions. In this manner, people can see how we are evolving the solution over time; the latest version then goes live on YOUTUBE. It’s an intereting dynamic and I’ve got a lot of ideas on how we can perfect this over time on other projects.

    I really liked your article and will definitely do additional research in this area. Best regards, Greg

  11. Dont act against the pressure-act with it…create a pipe larger and wider than the one the oil comes out of starting from the sea floor and surrounding the current pipe..add one section after another until the pipe is way above the point of oil release…the higher you go the less the pressure and higher the temperature…slowly taper the width of the pipe until you are high enough and have a narrow enough opening to attach a hose and pump the oil to ships on the surface.

  12. I would need to know the pressure involved in the oil escaping and the equipment available that can be used and then a system can be built to close the leak in days, I would be able to do the job. I worked in strata control in coal mines and was a commercial diver. I have engineering trade background. My work involved problem solving in adverse conditions and were life threatening and extremely dangerous at times. Do not change the subject the leak needs to be stopped and stopped now.

  13. How can professional oil drill team that builds a millions of dollar oil drilling facility in the middle of ocean without a backup plan? It is very ironic. Even a Dounkin Donut store in the Mystic, CT has a full safety design and safety protocol to follow so it can avoid any possible emergency. Ironically, a construction like oil drill facility which costs millions of dollar that requires far greater construction plan, safety protocol, environment impact evaluation and backup plans fail to solve an oil leakage after 50 days of crisis. From the BP headquarter to the department that approval the construction, how those people allow this to be happen?

    Check on the BP America Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/#!/BPAmerica?ref=ts, the answer may be there. The facebook of BP America is similar to how BP responds in the oil spill crisis. No answer, no progress, no promise and nothing helpful except itself keep updating how hard BP has been working for. As all the people who may concern, we need a solution or a proper respond to our concerns instead of keep promoting how hard BP has been doing. We need a solution and BP’s wiliness to accept criticizes and public suggestions.

    1. Arron made a comment that the donut store would have a plan and yes they would they own the problem if one and they would pay for the problem if one were created and there is the difference.
      It is easy to not come up with a plan, happens all the time I could write a book on the near misses that I have had to fix up in my time as an engineer. Talk about it is cheaper. Will they listen, no because the top and middle management would look stupid if they adopted any of the suggestions put forward especially by some bloke from Australia or anywhere else in the world. I have offered my services free of charge to BP and they know what and how I would fix it.. I also worked in the petrochemical industry and was taught diamond drilling by my ex father in law . So here it is, I think the job of stopping the leak would take about a week, I know I am not there but engineering problems are the same worldwide. I believe there is good men on the job if given the chance could do the job. If given the OK but they haven’t been asked to and they will not be asked. Over the years I have found that the laborers on the job know more than the engineers because they have the experience of the doing. People in general will not accept anything new and this is a problem as well.

  14. I did some more research and this article says it all. If you read it in full you will understand why suggestions will never work. I don’t know if this works but you will see the problem that this inventor and the world has at large.
    Fredericton inventor Dr. George Sutherland thinks he has the solution to cleaning up the millions of barrels of oil still spewing into the Gulf of Mexico from a damaged British Petroleum undersea well.
    Enlarge Photo
    Click to Enlarge
    Click to Enlarge
    Stephen MacGillivray
    Sutherland Separation Systems owner George Sutherland holds up a beaker with oil and water in it, left. His process will turn it into the water shown in the beaker on the right.

    He has developed and tested a product that is safe, cheap, non-toxic and cleans oil out of water at the molecular level.

    The only problem is he can’t get anybody to listen to him.

    “It has been very frustrating,” Sutherland told The Daily Gleaner this week.

    “We’ve had a series of investors who claimed they had money “¦ and when it came time to pay up the dollars weren’t there.”

    Another time Sutherland’s technology was about to be used full scale for the first time and the company he was working with went bankrupt.

    Sutherland, who has a PhD in chemistry from the University of New Brunswick, has also contacted government officials and major oil companies.

    “Nothing seems to happen,” he said.

    Sutherland’s invention is called microencapsulating flocculating dispersion or MFD.

    Exactly what it is made of is top secret.

    In its basic form it looks like little clear plastic beads. But when it’s turned into liquid form and sprayed on oily water and mixed, it makes the oil clump together so it’s easy to handle.

    It takes only seconds and one pound of MFD will treat 10,000 gallons of water.

    “It is safe,” said the 56-year-old scientist. “The polymer itself is food-contact grade.”

    Sutherland is confident that MFD will work on the open ocean.

    He said MFD, which is patented, can be produced as a sponge-like solid that absorbs oil or it could be sprayed onto the ocean as a liquid to make the oil clump up and float where it can be easily scooped up.

    “It actually works better in sea water than it does in fresh water,” he said.

    Sutherland remembers the exact eureka moment when the idea for MFD came to him.

    “I had been working with micropore polymers in fibre form for quite a few years before that for separating oil on water and I was also aware of the MFD dispersion,” he said.

    “I don’t know how to explain it. But at 4:30 a.m. Saturday morning March 23, 1998 I sat bolt upright in bed and said that liquid can solidify oil.

    “Four hours later I was in my lab looking at the first oil-MFD solid.”

    Sutherland’s company is called Sutherland Separations Systems and at that time had a lab in the Enterprise UNB building in Fredericton.

    Sutherland said using MFD oil recovery operations would be 20 per cent cheaper than traditional methods and require far less massive equipment.

    He said the ingredients in MFD are common and inexpensive. He said one ingredient is already used in the glue on cereal box lids.

    Ross Gilders, pilot plant manager at the Research and Productivity Council in Fredericton, has worked extensively with Sutherland on MFD.

    “I have never seen anything as effective as MFD,” he said. “It cleans the water.”

    Gilders said MFD has been extensively tested on water that is contaminated with oil at the concentration of 50,000 parts per million or five per cent oil.

    After it is mixed with MFD there is less than one part per million oil left in the water, he said.

    That isn’t drinkable but it is safe to release into the environment, said Gilders.

    RPC has overseen two large scale tests of MFD and ironically one of them six years ago was for British Petroleum at a facility they own in Trinidad and Tobago.

    “They were impressed,” said Gilders.

    But at the last minute BP decided not to invest in MFD, he said.

    Pemex, the Mexican state oil company, also did a pilot project a few years later.

    “Those tests were very successful,” said Gilders.

    “We had crystal clear water coming out and even recovered the oil for them. They wanted to follow up with a pilot.”

    That is when the problems with the investors began.

    Gilders said another problem facing the commercial use of MFD is that it has not yet been approved by the EPA for use in American waters.

    If anyone wants to see MFD in action they can view a four-minute video made several years ago by Sutherland at YouTube by searching for “MFDSutherland.”

    In the four-minute video he dips duck feathers into oily water and they come out covered in oil.

    After MFD is added to the oily water, new duck feathers are immersed and they come out clean.

    Then he scoops the congealed oil out of the water by hand – something normally impossible with oily water – and uses a paper towel to squeeze the water out of the oil, leaving an oil cake which can be safely handled.

    Theoretically, MFD in its sponge form could even plug the gushing BP oil well beneath the Gulf of Mexico, said Sutherland.

    Robot submersibles could force a large sponge into the broken pipe and it would absorb the escaping oil, expand and block the rupture, he said.

    And it doesn’t just work on oil. The inventor said it works on other contaminants in water such as heavy metal.

    Sutherland said he would welcome a call from any investor who reads about MFD.

    “The potential is just enormous,” he said.

  15. Lets fix the problem and worry about the clean afterwards. Look lets make it simple for them cause all of them are ducking for over and are vying for positions so they come out looking squeaky clean , Stick a football up the pipe and inflate it. Simple. Does it need to be made simpler.Incompetent Idiots.

Comments are closed.