BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

A Conversation With A Meteorologist In The Middle Of A 'Racial' Storm

Following
This article is more than 5 years old.

This morning I woke up with something on my mind so I often write in the quiet hours before the family awakens. Recently, a television meteorologist named Jeremy Kappell lost his job for allegedly uttering a racial slur. Was this a slip of the tongue or a deliberate racial prank involving one of the nation's most important and historic figures, Dr. Martin Luther King? To be honest, I am struggling to understand why Jeremy would basically commit career suicide by deliberately saying a racial slur on television. Al Roker defended Kappell, and Dr. King's daughter Bernice has also questioned Kappell being fired. However, enough people were offended that we have to deal with this and not sweep it under the rug. To be crystal clear, the term at the center of the controversy is highly offensive and has been used by many racially-insensitive people or groups. I watched the video and have done enough broadcast work to know that verbal slip-ups happen. TV meteorologists, unlike other newscasters, are unscripted and ad-lib for a living.  As we approach Dr. King's holiday, I reached out to Jeremy Kappell for a candid conversation about the controversy and race. I present his perspective for you to evaluate for yourself. I am not writing to change your viewpoint. However, as an African-American scientist within this field, I do see this as a teachable moment on race and an opportunity to highlight some very real issues. 

Jeremy Kappell

Marshall Shepherd: My gut sense is this was a slip of tongue.  You've acknowledged that. I believe you based on previous interactions with you. What do you say to people that saw it is offensive?
Jeremey Kappell: First, I want to reiterate the apology I've made to ANYONE who may have been offended by my unintentional verbal blunder. I've had people reach out to me to say you don't have anything to apologize for and while I appreciated the support in those responses, they are wrong. I do have something to apologize for. It's like when you are driving and you get into an accident. Say you rear end someone. You didn't intend to hit someone with your car. It was an accident, but you still hit someone with your car. So for anyone I accidentally hurt, I am sorry.
Marshall Shepherd: Many of have said, even if this was a mistake,  it rolled off so naturally that you likely have said this before. How do you respond to that?
Jeremy Kappell: That is just plain wrong thinking. We are all shaped by our environments and our personal experiences. Essentially, whether we want to admit it our not, we all have inherent biases through which we see the world. We are ALL biased and to some degree prejudiced by the lens of beliefs that may be far from the truth. For those that heard "that word", I think it speaks more to the biases of the listener than it does from those who made the verbal stumble. Keep in mind, this exact same stumble over the words "Dr. Martin Luther King Junior" have been made at least three times on air over the last 15 years. There's a reason for that. Something I've learned since, is a term known as a "spoonerism". This is the combining of two words into one. In this case, as in the other three cases mentioned, I made accidentally combined the words "King + Junior". Now had I completely the spoonerism, I would've arrived at "Kunior". Unfortunately for me, I stopped myself halfway through before correcting to "King Junior." It was a rather unfortunate, and now costly mistake to me and my family.
Marshall Shepherd: Do you think there are generally challenges with race in newsrooms or in broadcast?
Jeremy Kappell:  That's a difficult question for me address considering I've never been responsible for the hiring/firing of anyone in any of the newsrooms I've worked for. However, I do see the need for racial diversity and the need for our newsroom to reflect the values of our viewers by telling the stories that are most relevant to them. And I would say that it has been well documented that the black community particularly remains underrepresented in broadcast.

NPS

You will have to decide for yourself what you believe, but either way, this event provides a teachable moment on the delicate intersection of race, media, and science. As a former president of the American Meteorological Society (AMS), I know that the number of African American broadcast, research, and operational meteorologists hovers around 2%. That's an unacceptable number. There are institutionalized, cultural, and economic reasons that are beyond the scope of this essay. Additionally, there are known challenges with how African Americans are perceived within the scientific and broadcast meteorology communities.

As president of the AMS, the largest professional society in our field, I recall standing with colleagues in a conference hotel. We were all wearing suits, but I was asked by a patron if I was the airport shuttle driver. At another major conference in which I was invited to be the keynote speaker, I was asked 4 times if I was the hotel staff. To be clear, these are all admirable professions so don't miss my point. Much of my family has worked in the service industry for years.

Within the past year, I was racially harassed because someone disagreed with me about climate change. I opined on that experience at this link in Forbes. I have also written about African American broadcast meteorologist colleagues facing disparaging comments from viewers for wearing their hair in its natural styles. There are colleagues that alter their hairstyle or wear wigs to meet some imaginary standard of acceptability for viewers or newsrooms.

There are no "cards" being played here except the reality card. To put our heads in the sands and argue there are not challenges with race and the broadcast sector is naive. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that every situation has malicious intent. I am a firm believer that race-related issues like this must be confronted head on by all parties involved and learned from.

I asked Jeremy what can be learned from this incident. He told me,

I think the most important lesson to rise out of my circumstance is the one taught by the great Dr. King himself. Do not judge a man by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. While I wasn't judged by the color of my skin, I was judged by something just as superficial. A short clip of me bobbling my words on air. Without any other information about me, my life, family, my career, my past, my character... was immediately attacked by so little information. That's the lesson I see here. Let's not hurry to judge or condemn someone based on something floating around on social media that may be a complete mischaracterization of that person. This is no better than cyberbullying... and like cyberbullying it hurts. Lives can be ruined by these mischaracterizations and it must be stood up against.
You can decide what you believe. For me, the broader conversation was important.
Follow me on TwitterCheck out my website